Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

June 03, 2024 00:31:01
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings
Law Bytes
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Jun 03 2024 | 00:31:01

/

Show Notes

Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.

Other Episodes

Episode

December 16, 2024 00:33:41
Episode Cover

Episode 223: The Year in Canadian Digital Law and Policy

Canadian digital law and policy in 2024 featured the long-delayed online harms bill, controversial implementation of streaming and online news legislation, as well as...

Listen

Episode 0

June 16, 2025 00:39:49
Episode Cover

Episode 236: Robert Diab on the Return of Lawful Access

Lawful access is back. Bill C-2, the government’s border bill, includes a new information demand power that would result in warrantless disclosure of information...

Listen

Episode 0

September 23, 2024 00:32:38
Episode Cover

Episode 213: Elaine Craig on Mainstreaming Porn and Why Bill S-210 May Make Matters Worse

Bill S-210, the controversial age verification bill which purports to limit access to pornography for those under 18, could be headed for a final...

Listen