Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

June 03, 2024 00:31:01
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings
Law Bytes
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Jun 03 2024 | 00:31:01

/

Show Notes

Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.

Other Episodes

Episode

March 31, 2025 00:38:30
Episode Cover

Episode 230: Aengus Bridgman on the 2025 Federal Election, Social Media Platforms, and Misinformation

The 2025 federal election is now in its second week and the battle for attention and ultimately votes is taking place both online and...

Listen

Episode 0

October 19, 2021 00:21:13
Episode Cover

Episode 96: More Harm Than Good - My Appearance Before the Senate Transport Committee on a Copyright Bill to Support Media Organizations

Bill S-225, Senator Claude Carignan’s copyright bill, would create a new compensation scheme for media organizations by establishing a new collective rights system for...

Listen

Episode

November 10, 2025 00:49:18
Episode Cover

Episode 249: The Debate Over Canada’s AI Strategy - My Consultation Submission and Appearance at the Canadian Heritage Committee

The government’s AI consultation concluded at the end of October with expectations that a strategy will emerge before the end of the year. I...

Listen