Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

June 03, 2024 00:31:01
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings
Law Bytes
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Jun 03 2024 | 00:31:01

/

Show Notes

Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.

Other Episodes

Episode

February 12, 2024 00:36:56
Episode Cover

Episode 192: Kate Robertson on the Privacy, Expression and Affordability Risks in Bill C-26

Bill C-26, alternately described as a cyber-security, critical infrastructure or telecom bill, remains largely below the radar screen despite its serious implications for privacy,...

Listen

Episode

April 15, 2024 00:33:21
Episode Cover

Episode 199: Boris Bytensky on the Criminal Code Reforms in the Online Harms Act

The Online Harms Act – otherwise known as Bill C-63 – is really at least three bills in one. The Law Bytes podcast tackled...

Listen

Episode

November 07, 2022 00:27:30
Episode Cover

Episode 145: Why Bill C-18’s Mandated Payments for Links is a Threat to Freedom of Expression in Canada

The hearings on the Online News Act – Bill C-18  - wrapped up last week with a final session in which I had the...

Listen