Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

June 03, 2024 00:31:01
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings
Law Bytes
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Jun 03 2024 | 00:31:01

/

Show Notes

Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.

Other Episodes

Episode

December 02, 2024 00:37:11
Episode Cover

Episode 221: Inside My Canadian Heritage Committee Appearance on Freedom of Expression

The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage has for the past month been conducting a study on protecting freedom of expression. The counters of the...

Listen

Episode 0

December 09, 2024 00:41:39
Episode Cover

Episode 222: Robert Diab on Canadian Media’s Copyright Lawsuit Against OpenAI

Canada’s largest media companies came together recently to file a copyright infringement lawsuit against OpenAI, the owners of ChatGPT. I wrote about the suit,...

Listen

Episode 0

September 09, 2024 00:48:58
Episode Cover

Episode 211: Carlos Affonso Souza on the Unprecedented Brazilian Court Order Blocking Twitter/X and VPN Use to Access the Service

The Law Bytes podcast is back with a deep dive into a high profile case coming out of Brazil, where Twitter or X has...

Listen