Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

June 03, 2024 00:31:01
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings
Law Bytes
Episode 204: What Could Have Been for the Bill S-210 Hearings

Jun 03 2024 | 00:31:01

/

Show Notes

Bill S-210, the mandated age verification bill for pornography sites that in reality targets everything from Google Search to Netflix, was expected to be the subject of extensive hearings by the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security. But after a Conservative filibuster, it appears that there will be only one hearing and that the bill will be reported back to the House unamended. Before that vote, this week’s Law Bytes podcast offers up a “what could have been” hearing on the bill. It features my mock opening statement alongside responses to some of the actual questions raised by MPs on issues such as privacy, website blocking, and poorly defined terms in the bill.

Other Episodes

Episode

June 23, 2025 00:37:23
Episode Cover

Episode 237: A Conversation with Jason Woywada of BCFIPA on Political Party Privacy and Bill C-4

The government’s unexpected privacy reform agenda includes both lawful access in Bill C-2 and the evisceration of political party privacy in Bill C-4. While...

Listen

Episode 0

November 13, 2023 00:30:54
Episode Cover

Episode 184: Philip Palmer on the Constitutional Doubts About the Government’s Internet Laws

Is the Canadian government’s Internet legislation constitutional? That question arose during the hearings on Bills C-11 and C-18, but has taken on a new...

Listen

Episode

March 23, 2026 00:42:57
Episode Cover

Episode 262: Zack Shapiro on the Claude AI Native Law Firm

What are the limits of using AI to help run a legal practice? There is much discussion about what an AI future might look...

Listen