Over the past couple of weeks, there has been mounting outrage over a CRTC decision involving Radio-Canada and a broadcast segment from 2020 in which the N-word was used multiple times as part of a discussion of a book that contains the word in its title. That decision has sparked cries of censorship and concerns about the CRTC. Given that Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez and the government want to give the CRTC even power over Internet content as part of Bill C-11, the implications extend beyond this case. Monica Auer, the executive director of the Forum for Research and Policy in Communications, joins the Law Bytes podcast to discuss the latest developments, the broader concerns with CRTC governance, and whether assurances regarding Internet speech safeguards stand up to careful scrutiny.
Canada now finds itself in economic war with the United States as President Donald Trump has levied a 25% tariff on all Canadian goods...
“Chilling effects” is a term people hear all the time: in court rulings, in debates over content moderation, in dealing with online harms, or...
Several years ago, the Privacy Commissioner of Canada filed a reference with the federal court in a case that was billed as settling the...